AI model comparison

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is a multilingual, instruction-tuned mixture-of-experts language model based on the Qwen3-235B architecture, with 22B active parameters per forward pass.

Input / 1M
$0.09
Output / 1M
$0.55
Context
262K

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward

Input / 1M
$0.19
Output / 1M
$0.65
Context
1.05M

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

qwen logo

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

1.5x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

qwen logo

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

12 vs 10 on Artificial Analysis

Larger context window

meta-llama logo

Llama 4 Maverick

1.05M vs 262K tokens

Newer release

qwen logo

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Released July 21, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 250712
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverick10

Coding index

qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Not available
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverick16.3

Agentic index

qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Not available
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverick0.6

Pricing

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Llama 4 Maverick API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metricqwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507meta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverick
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$0.09$0.19
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$0.55$0.65
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokensNot available$0.05
Cache writePer 1M tokensNot availableNot available

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.46
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverick$0.70

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$4.90
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverick$8.24$4.11 cached

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$14.60
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverick$29.43$8.81 cached

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metricqwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507meta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverick
Context window262K tokens1.05M tokens
Max output16K tokens16K tokens
Input typesTextImage, Text
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsNot availableNot available
Default reasoning effortNot availableNot available
Release dateJuly 21, 2025April 5, 2025

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metricqwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507meta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverick
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputsSupportedSupported
JSON modeSupportedSupported
ReasoningNot supportedNot supported
TemperatureSupportedSupported
Stop sequencesSupportedSupported
Deterministic seedSupportedSupported
Verbosity controlNot supportedNot supported

Our take

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is 1.5x cheaper for a typical chat. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (12 vs 10). Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window (1.05M vs 262K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 or Llama 4 Maverick cheaper?

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 per 1M input tokens and $0.55 per 1M output tokens, while Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.19 per 1M input tokens and $0.65 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 262K for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507.

Is Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 smarter than Llama 4 Maverick?

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 scores 12 and Llama 4 Maverick scores 10, putting Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.

Can I use Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Llama 4 Maverick at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Llama 4 Maverick answer side by side and keep the better response.

qwen logometa-llama logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Llama 4 Maverick at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.