AI model comparison

GLM 4.6V vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.

GLM-4.6V is a large multimodal model designed for high-fidelity visual understanding and long-context reasoning across images, documents, and mixed media.

Input / 1M
$0.30
Output / 1M
$0.90
Context
131K

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is a multilingual, instruction-tuned mixture-of-experts language model based on the Qwen3-235B architecture, with 22B active parameters per forward pass.

Input / 1M
$0.09
Output / 1M
$0.55
Context
262K

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

qwen logo

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

2.3x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

qwen logo

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

12 vs 11.2 on Artificial Analysis

Larger context window

qwen logo

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

262K vs 131K tokens

Newer release

z-ai logo

GLM 4.6V

Released December 8, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

z-ai logoGLM 4.6V11.2
qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 250712

Coding index

z-ai logoGLM 4.6VNot available
qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Not available

Agentic index

z-ai logoGLM 4.6VNot available
qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Not available

Pricing

GLM 4.6V vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metricz-ai logoGLM 4.6Vqwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$0.30$0.09
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$0.90$0.55
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens$0.06Not available
Cache writePer 1M tokensNot availableNot available

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

z-ai logoGLM 4.6V$1.05
qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.46

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

z-ai logoGLM 4.6V$12.60$5.25 cached
qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$4.90

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

z-ai logoGLM 4.6V$46.80$10.05 cached
qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$14.60

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metricz-ai logoGLM 4.6Vqwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Context window131K tokens262K tokens
Max output33K tokens16K tokens
Input typesImage, Text, VideoText
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsNot availableNot available
Default reasoning effortNot availableNot available
Release dateDecember 8, 2025July 21, 2025

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metricz-ai logoGLM 4.6Vqwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputsNot supportedSupported
JSON modeSupportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedNot supported
TemperatureSupportedSupported
Stop sequencesSupportedSupported
Deterministic seedSupportedSupported
Verbosity controlNot supportedNot supported

Our take

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is 2.3x cheaper for a typical chat. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (12 vs 11.2). Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has the larger context window (262K vs 131K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM 4.6V or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 cheaper?

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 per 1M input tokens and $0.55 per 1M output tokens, while GLM 4.6V costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $0.90 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, GLM 4.6V or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 supports up to 262K tokens of context, compared with 131K for GLM 4.6V.

Is GLM 4.6V smarter than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, GLM 4.6V scores 11.2 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 scores 12, putting Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.

Can I use GLM 4.6V and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see GLM 4.6V and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 answer side by side and keep the better response.

z-ai logoqwen logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to GLM 4.6V and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.