AI model comparison
GLM 4.5 Air vs Llama 4 Maverick
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
Z.ai
GLM 4.5 Air
GLM-4.5-Air is the lightweight variant of our latest flagship model family, also purpose-built for agent-centric applications.
- Input / 1M
- $0.13
- Output / 1M
- $0.85
- Context
- 131K
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward
- Input / 1M
- $0.19
- Output / 1M
- $0.65
- Context
- 1.05M
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
GLM 4.5 Air
1.0x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
GLM 4.5 Air
11.1 vs 10 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
Llama 4 Maverick
1.05M vs 131K tokens
Newer release
GLM 4.5 Air
Released July 25, 2025
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Coding index
Agentic index
Pricing
GLM 4.5 Air vs Llama 4 Maverick API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.13 | $0.19 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.85 | $0.65 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.03 | $0.05 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Long document summary
150K in, 2K out
Specs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 131K tokens | 1.05M tokens |
| Max output | 98K tokens | 16K tokens |
| Input types | Text | Image, Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Not available | Not available |
| Default reasoning effort | Not available | Not available |
| Release date | July 25, 2025 | April 5, 2025 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Not supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Not supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Not supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
- GLM 4.5 Air vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
- GLM 4.5 Air vs GPT-4.1 Mini
- GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
- GLM 4.5 Air vs GLM 4.7 Flash
- GLM 4.5 Air vs Mercury 2
- GLM 4.5 Air vs GLM 4.5
- GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
- GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen3 Coder Next
- GLM 4.5 Air vs Mistral Small 4
- GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
- GLM 4.5 Air vs GLM 4.6V
- GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
- GLM 4.5 Air vs Trinity Large Thinking
- GLM 4.5 Air vs GLM 4.5V
- Llama 4 Maverick vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
- Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-4o-mini
- Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
- Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 Coder Next
- Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
- Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V3 0324
- Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 4
- Llama 4 Maverick vs Trinity Large Thinking
- Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout
- Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Our take
GLM 4.5 Air is 1.0x cheaper for a typical chat. GLM 4.5 Air scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (11.1 vs 10). Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window (1.05M vs 131K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM 4.5 Air or Llama 4 Maverick cheaper?
GLM 4.5 Air is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.13 per 1M input tokens and $0.85 per 1M output tokens, while Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.19 per 1M input tokens and $0.65 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, GLM 4.5 Air or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 131K for GLM 4.5 Air.
Is GLM 4.5 Air smarter than Llama 4 Maverick?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, GLM 4.5 Air scores 11.1 and Llama 4 Maverick scores 10, putting GLM 4.5 Air ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use GLM 4.5 Air and Llama 4 Maverick at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see GLM 4.5 Air and Llama 4 Maverick answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to GLM 4.5 Air and Llama 4 Maverick at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.