AI model comparison
GLM 4.7 Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
Z.ai
GLM 4.7 Flash
As a 30B-class SOTA model, GLM-4.7-Flash offers a new option that balances performance and efficiency.
- Input / 1M
- $0.06
- Output / 1M
- $0.40
- Context
- 200K
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is a multilingual, instruction-tuned mixture-of-experts language model based on the Qwen3-235B architecture, with 22B active parameters per forward pass.
- Input / 1M
- $0.09
- Output / 1M
- $0.55
- Context
- 262K
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
GLM 4.7 Flash
1.4x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
GLM 4.7 Flash
14.9 vs 12 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
262K vs 200K tokens
Newer release
GLM 4.7 Flash
Released January 19, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 250712Coding index
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Not availableAgentic index
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Not availablePricing
GLM 4.7 Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.06 | $0.09 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.40 | $0.55 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.46Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$4.90Long document summary
150K in, 2K out
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$14.60Specs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 | |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 200K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Max output | 118K tokens | 16K tokens |
| Input types | Text | Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Not available | Not available |
| Default reasoning effort | Not available | Not available |
| Release date | January 19, 2026 | July 21, 2025 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Not supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
- GLM 4.7 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
- GLM 4.7 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
- GLM 4.7 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B
- GLM 4.7 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B
- GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-5 Nano
- GLM 4.7 Flash vs Step 3.5 Flash
- GLM 4.7 Flash vs DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
- GLM 4.7 Flash vs DeepSeek V3.1
- GLM 4.7 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super
- GLM 4.7 Flash vs GLM 4.5 Air
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507View full model details- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs gpt-oss-120b
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Flash
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs GPT-5 Nano
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs DeepSeek V3.1
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Mercury 2.5
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Llama 4 Maverick
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Nemotron 3 Super
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs GLM 4.5 Air
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Mistral Small 4
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Mercury 2
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs GLM 4.6V
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Trinity Large Thinking
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 30B A3B
Our take
GLM 4.7 Flash is 1.4x cheaper for a typical chat. GLM 4.7 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (14.9 vs 12). Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has the larger context window (262K vs 200K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM 4.7 Flash or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 cheaper?
GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.06 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens, while Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 per 1M input tokens and $0.55 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, GLM 4.7 Flash or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 supports up to 262K tokens of context, compared with 200K for GLM 4.7 Flash.
Is GLM 4.7 Flash smarter than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, GLM 4.7 Flash scores 14.9 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 scores 12, putting GLM 4.7 Flash ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.