AI model comparison

Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout

Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward

Input / 1M
$0.19
Output / 1M
$0.65
Context
1.05M

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (16E) is a mixture-of-experts (MoE) language model developed by Meta, activating 17 billion parameters out of a total of 109B.

Input / 1M
$0.10
Output / 1M
$0.30
Context
1.31M

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

meta-llama logo

Llama 4 Scout

2.0x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

meta-llama logo

Llama 4 Maverick

10 vs 8.1 on Artificial Analysis

Larger context window

meta-llama logo

Llama 4 Scout

1.31M vs 1.05M tokens

Newer release

meta-llama logo

Llama 4 Maverick

Released April 5, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

meta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverick10
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout8.1

Coding index

meta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverick16.3
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout8.2

Agentic index

meta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverick0.6
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout0.5

Pricing

Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metricmeta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverickmeta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$0.19$0.10
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$0.65$0.30
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens$0.05Not available
Cache writePer 1M tokensNot availableNot available

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

meta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverick$0.70
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout$0.35

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

meta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverick$8.24$4.11 cached
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout$4.20

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

meta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverick$29.43$8.81 cached
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout$15.60

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metricmeta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverickmeta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout
Context window1.05M tokens1.31M tokens
Max output16K tokens16K tokens
Input typesImage, TextImage, Text
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsNot availableNot available
Default reasoning effortNot availableNot available
Release dateApril 5, 2025April 5, 2025

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metricmeta-llama logoLlama 4 Maverickmeta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputsSupportedSupported
JSON modeSupportedSupported
ReasoningNot supportedNot supported
TemperatureSupportedSupported
Stop sequencesSupportedSupported
Deterministic seedSupportedSupported
Verbosity controlNot supportedNot supported

Our take

Llama 4 Scout is 2.0x cheaper for a typical chat. Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (10 vs 8.1). Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.31M vs 1.05M tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 4 Maverick or Llama 4 Scout cheaper?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Llama 4 Scout costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.30 per 1M output tokens, while Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.19 per 1M input tokens and $0.65 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, Llama 4 Maverick or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout supports up to 1.31M tokens of context, compared with 1.05M for Llama 4 Maverick.

Is Llama 4 Maverick smarter than Llama 4 Scout?

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Llama 4 Maverick scores 10 and Llama 4 Scout scores 8.1, putting Llama 4 Maverick ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.

Can I use Llama 4 Maverick and Llama 4 Scout at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Llama 4 Maverick and Llama 4 Scout answer side by side and keep the better response.

meta-llama logometa-llama logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to Llama 4 Maverick and Llama 4 Scout at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.