AI model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Llama 4 Scout

Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a lightweight reasoning model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for ultra-low latency and cost efficiency.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is scheduled to be retired on October 20, 2026. Consider Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite instead.

Input / 1M
$0.10
Output / 1M
$0.40
Context
1.05M

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (16E) is a mixture-of-experts (MoE) language model developed by Meta, activating 17 billion parameters out of a total of 109B.

Input / 1M
$0.10
Output / 1M
$0.30
Context
1.31M

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

meta-llama logo

Llama 4 Scout

1.1x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

google logo

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

10.4 vs 8.1 on Artificial Analysis

Larger context window

meta-llama logo

Llama 4 Scout

1.31M vs 1.05M tokens

Newer release

google logo

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Released July 22, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

google logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite10.4
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout8.1

Coding index

google logoGemini 2.5 Flash LiteNot available
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout8.2

Agentic index

google logoGemini 2.5 Flash LiteNot available
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout0.5

Pricing

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Llama 4 Scout API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metricgoogle logoGemini 2.5 Flash Litemeta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$0.10$0.10
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$0.40$0.30
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens$0.01Not available
Cache writePer 1M tokens$0.08Not available
Web searchPer request$0.014Not available

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

google logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.40
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout$0.35

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

google logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite$4.60$1.90 cached
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout$4.20

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

google logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite$15.80$2.30 cached
meta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout$15.60

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metricgoogle logoGemini 2.5 Flash Litemeta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout
Context window1.05M tokens1.31M tokens
Max output66K tokens16K tokens
Input typesAudio, File, Image, Text, VideoImage, Text
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsNot availableNot available
Default reasoning effortNot availableNot available
Release dateJuly 22, 2025April 5, 2025

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metricgoogle logoGemini 2.5 Flash Litemeta-llama logoLlama 4 Scout
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputsSupportedSupported
JSON modeSupportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedNot supported
TemperatureSupportedSupported
Stop sequencesSupportedSupported
Deterministic seedSupportedSupported
Verbosity controlNot supportedNot supported

Our take

Llama 4 Scout is 1.1x cheaper for a typical chat. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (10.4 vs 8.1). Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.31M vs 1.05M tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Llama 4 Scout cheaper?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Llama 4 Scout costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.30 per 1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout supports up to 1.31M tokens of context, compared with 1.05M for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite smarter than Llama 4 Scout?

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite scores 10.4 and Llama 4 Scout scores 8.1, putting Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.

Can I use Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Llama 4 Scout at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Llama 4 Scout answer side by side and keep the better response.

google logometa-llama logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Llama 4 Scout at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.