AI model comparison

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.

Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct is a 30.5B parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model with 128 experts (8 active per forward pass), designed for advanced code generation, repository-scale understanding, and agentic tool use.

Input / 1M
$0.07
Output / 1M
$0.28
Context
262K

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a lightweight reasoning model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for ultra-low latency and cost efficiency.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is scheduled to be retired on October 20, 2026. Consider Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite instead.

Input / 1M
$0.10
Output / 1M
$0.40
Context
1.05M

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

qwen logo

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct

1.4x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

google logo

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

10.4 vs 9.6 on Artificial Analysis

Larger context window

google logo

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

1.05M vs 262K tokens

Newer release

qwen logo

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct

Released July 31, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

qwen logoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct9.6
google logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite10.4

Coding index

qwen logoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructNot available
google logoGemini 2.5 Flash LiteNot available

Agentic index

qwen logoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructNot available
google logoGemini 2.5 Flash LiteNot available

Pricing

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metricqwen logoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instructgoogle logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$0.07$0.10
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$0.28$0.40
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokensNot available$0.01
Cache writePer 1M tokensNot available$0.08
Web searchPer requestNot available$0.014

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

qwen logoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.28
google logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.40

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

qwen logoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$3.22
google logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite$4.60$1.90 cached

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

qwen logoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$11.06
google logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite$15.80$2.30 cached

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metricqwen logoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instructgoogle logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Context window262K tokens1.05M tokens
Max output236K tokens66K tokens
Input typesTextAudio, File, Image, Text, Video
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsNot availableNot available
Default reasoning effortNot availableNot available
Release dateJuly 31, 2025July 22, 2025

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metricqwen logoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instructgoogle logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputsSupportedSupported
JSON modeSupportedSupported
ReasoningNot supportedSupported
TemperatureSupportedSupported
Stop sequencesSupportedSupported
Deterministic seedNot supportedSupported
Verbosity controlNot supportedNot supported

Our take

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct is 1.4x cheaper for a typical chat. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (10.4 vs 9.6). Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has the larger context window (1.05M vs 262K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite cheaper?

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.07 per 1M input tokens and $0.28 per 1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 262K for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct.

Is Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct smarter than Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct scores 9.6 and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite scores 10.4, putting Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.

Can I use Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite answer side by side and keep the better response.

qwen logogoogle logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.