AI model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs DeepSeek V3 0324

Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a lightweight reasoning model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for ultra-low latency and cost efficiency.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is scheduled to be retired on October 20, 2026. Consider Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite instead.

Input / 1M
$0.10
Output / 1M
$0.40
Context
1.05M

DeepSeek V3, a 685B-parameter, mixture-of-experts model, is the latest iteration of the flagship chat model family from the DeepSeek team.

Input / 1M
$0.29
Output / 1M
$1.14
Context
164K

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

google logo

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

2.9x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

google logo

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

10.4 vs 9.7 on Artificial Analysis

Larger context window

google logo

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

1.05M vs 164K tokens

Newer release

google logo

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Released July 22, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

google logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite10.4
deepseek logoDeepSeek V3 03249.7

Coding index

google logoGemini 2.5 Flash LiteNot available
deepseek logoDeepSeek V3 032421.2

Agentic index

google logoGemini 2.5 Flash LiteNot available
deepseek logoDeepSeek V3 03240.8

Pricing

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs DeepSeek V3 0324 API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metricgoogle logoGemini 2.5 Flash Litedeepseek logoDeepSeek V3 0324
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$0.10$0.29
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$0.40$1.14
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens$0.01$0.11
Cache writePer 1M tokens$0.08Not available
Web searchPer request$0.014Not available

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

google logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.40
deepseek logoDeepSeek V3 0324$1.15

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

google logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite$4.60$1.90 cached
deepseek logoDeepSeek V3 0324$13.26$7.86 cached

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

google logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite$15.80$2.30 cached
deepseek logoDeepSeek V3 0324$45.78$18.78 cached

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metricgoogle logoGemini 2.5 Flash Litedeepseek logoDeepSeek V3 0324
Context window1.05M tokens164K tokens
Max output66K tokens115K tokens
Input typesAudio, File, Image, Text, VideoText
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsNot availableNot available
Default reasoning effortNot availableNot available
Release dateJuly 22, 2025March 24, 2025

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metricgoogle logoGemini 2.5 Flash Litedeepseek logoDeepSeek V3 0324
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputsSupportedSupported
JSON modeSupportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedNot supported
TemperatureSupportedSupported
Stop sequencesSupportedNot supported
Deterministic seedSupportedSupported
Verbosity controlNot supportedNot supported

Our take

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is 2.9x cheaper for a typical chat. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (10.4 vs 9.7). Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has the larger context window (1.05M vs 164K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or DeepSeek V3 0324 cheaper?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens, while DeepSeek V3 0324 costs $0.29 per 1M input tokens and $1.14 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or DeepSeek V3 0324?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 164K for DeepSeek V3 0324.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite smarter than DeepSeek V3 0324?

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite scores 10.4 and DeepSeek V3 0324 scores 9.7, putting Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.

Can I use Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and DeepSeek V3 0324 at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and DeepSeek V3 0324 answer side by side and keep the better response.

google logodeepseek logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and DeepSeek V3 0324 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.