AI model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a lightweight reasoning model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for ultra-low latency and cost efficiency.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is scheduled to be retired on October 20, 2026. Consider Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite instead.
- Input / 1M
- $0.10
- Output / 1M
- $0.40
- Context
- 1.05M
Qwen2.5 72B is the latest series of Qwen large language models.
- Input / 1M
- $0.36
- Output / 1M
- $0.40
- Context
- 33K
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
2.3x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
10.4 vs 7.7 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
1.05M vs 33K tokens
Newer release
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Released July 22, 2025
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite10.4
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct7.7Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteNot availableQwen2.5 72B InstructNot availableAgentic index
Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteNot availableQwen2.5 72B InstructNot availablePricing
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.10 | $0.36 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.40 | $0.40 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.01 | Not available |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | $0.08 | Not available |
| Web searchPer request | $0.014 | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$0.40Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.92Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$4.60$1.90 cachedQwen2.5 72B Instruct$12.40Long document summary
150K in, 2K out
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite$15.80$2.30 cachedQwen2.5 72B Instruct$54.80Specs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.05M tokens | 33K tokens |
| Max output | 66K tokens | 16K tokens |
| Input types | Audio, File, Image, Text, Video | Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Not available | Not available |
| Default reasoning effort | Not available | Not available |
| Release date | July 22, 2025 | September 19, 2024 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Not supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteView full model details- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Gemma 4 31B
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Gemma 4 26B A4B
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-5 Nano
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-4.1 Mini
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Gemma 3 27B
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Mercury 2.5
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 Coder Next
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs DeepSeek V3 0324
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-4.1 Nano
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Llama 4 Maverick
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 32B
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs GLM 4.7 Flash
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Nemotron 3 Super
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs GLM 4.5 Air
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Gemma 3 12B
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Mistral Small 4
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Llama 4 Scout
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 14B
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Mercury 2
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs GLM 4.6V
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Trinity Large Thinking
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Solar Pro 3
Qwen2.5 72B InstructView full model details- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Gemma 3 27B
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 32B
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 14B
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs GPT-4.1 Nano
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Solar Pro 3
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Our take
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is 2.3x cheaper for a typical chat. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (10.4 vs 7.7). Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has the larger context window (1.05M vs 33K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct cheaper?
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.36 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 33K for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite smarter than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite scores 10.4 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores 7.7, putting Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.