AI model comparison
Qwen3.7 Max vs Claude Opus 4.5
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
Qwen
Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7-Max is the flagship model in Alibaba's Qwen3.7 series.
- Input / 1M
- $1.48
- Output / 1M
- $4.43
- Context
- 1M
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Claude Opus 4.5 is Anthropic’s frontier reasoning model optimized for complex software engineering, agentic workflows, and long-horizon computer use.
- Input / 1M
- $5
- Output / 1M
- $25
- Context
- 200K
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
Qwen3.7 Max
4.4x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Qwen3.7 Max
29.5 vs 29.1 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
Qwen3.7 Max
1M vs 200K tokens
Newer release
Qwen3.7 Max
Released May 21, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Qwen3.7 Max29.5Claude Opus 4.529.1Coding index
Qwen3.7 Max66Claude Opus 4.5Not availableAgentic index
Qwen3.7 Max22.5Claude Opus 4.5Not availablePricing
Qwen3.7 Max vs Claude Opus 4.5 API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Max | Claude Opus 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $1.48 | $5 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $4.43 | $25 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.50 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | $1.84 | $6.25 |
| Web searchPer request | Not available | $0.01 |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Qwen3.7 Max$5.16Claude Opus 4.5$22.50Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Qwen3.7 Max$61.95$26.55 cachedClaude Opus 4.5$250$115 cachedLong document summary
150K in, 2K out
Qwen3.7 Max$230.10$53.10 cachedClaude Opus 4.5$800$125 cachedSpecs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Max | Claude Opus 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 200K tokens |
| Max output | 131K tokens | 64K tokens |
| Input types | Text | File, Image, Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Not available | Not available |
| Default reasoning effort | Not available | Not available |
| Release date | May 21, 2026 | November 24, 2025 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Max | Claude Opus 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Supported | Not supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
Claude Opus 4.5View full model details- Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM 5.2
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.3-Codex
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.2
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.2-Codex
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.1
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5
Our take
Qwen3.7 Max is 4.4x cheaper for a typical chat. Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (29.5 vs 29.1). Qwen3.7 Max has the larger context window (1M vs 200K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.7 Max or Claude Opus 4.5 cheaper?
Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.48 per 1M input tokens and $4.43 per 1M output tokens, while Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5 per 1M input tokens and $25 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, Qwen3.7 Max or Claude Opus 4.5?
Qwen3.7 Max supports up to 1M tokens of context, compared with 200K for Claude Opus 4.5.
Is Qwen3.7 Max smarter than Claude Opus 4.5?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Qwen3.7 Max scores 29.5 and Claude Opus 4.5 scores 29.1, putting Qwen3.7 Max ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use Qwen3.7 Max and Claude Opus 4.5 at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Qwen3.7 Max and Claude Opus 4.5 answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to Qwen3.7 Max and Claude Opus 4.5 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.