AI model comparison
Qwen3.7 Max vs GLM 5
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
Qwen
Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7-Max is the flagship model in Alibaba's Qwen3.7 series.
- Input / 1M
- $1.48
- Output / 1M
- $4.43
- Context
- 1M
Z.ai
GLM 5
GLM-5 is Z.ai’s flagship open-source foundation model engineered for complex systems design and long-horizon agent workflows.
- Input / 1M
- $0.60
- Output / 1M
- $1.92
- Context
- 205K
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
GLM 5
2.4x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Qwen3.7 Max
29.5 vs 27.9 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
Qwen3.7 Max
1M vs 205K tokens
Newer release
Qwen3.7 Max
Released May 21, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Coding index
Agentic index
Pricing
Qwen3.7 Max vs GLM 5 API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $1.48 | $0.60 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $4.43 | $1.92 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.12 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | $1.84 | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Long document summary
150K in, 2K out
Specs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 205K tokens |
| Max output | 131K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Input types | Text | Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Not available | Not available |
| Default reasoning effort | Not available | Not available |
| Release date | May 21, 2026 | February 11, 2026 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Our take
GLM 5 is 2.4x cheaper for a typical chat. Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (29.5 vs 27.9). Qwen3.7 Max has the larger context window (1M vs 205K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.7 Max or GLM 5 cheaper?
GLM 5 is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). GLM 5 costs $0.60 per 1M input tokens and $1.92 per 1M output tokens, while Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.48 per 1M input tokens and $4.43 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, Qwen3.7 Max or GLM 5?
Qwen3.7 Max supports up to 1M tokens of context, compared with 205K for GLM 5.
Is Qwen3.7 Max smarter than GLM 5?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Qwen3.7 Max scores 29.5 and GLM 5 scores 27.9, putting Qwen3.7 Max ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use Qwen3.7 Max and GLM 5 at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Qwen3.7 Max and GLM 5 answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to Qwen3.7 Max and GLM 5 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.