AI model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Claude Opus 4.5

Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google’s frontier reasoning model, delivering enhanced software engineering performance, improved agentic reliability, and more efficient token usage across complex workflows.

Input / 1M
$2
Output / 1M
$12
Context
1.05M

Claude Opus 4.5 is Anthropic’s frontier reasoning model optimized for complex software engineering, agentic workflows, and long-horizon computer use.

Input / 1M
$5
Output / 1M
$25
Context
200K

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

google logo

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

2.3x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

google logo

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

29.7 vs 29.1 on Artificial Analysis

Larger context window

google logo

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

1.05M vs 200K tokens

Newer release

google logo

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Released February 19, 2026

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview29.7
anthropic logoClaude Opus 4.529.1

Coding index

google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview68.8
anthropic logoClaude Opus 4.5Not available

Agentic index

google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview8.2
anthropic logoClaude Opus 4.5Not available

Pricing

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Claude Opus 4.5 API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metricgoogle logoGemini 3.1 Pro Previewanthropic logoClaude Opus 4.5
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$2$5
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$12$25
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens$0.20$0.50
Cache writePer 1M tokens$0.38$6.25
Long-context pricingPer 1M tokens, for very long prompts$4 in / $18 out above 200KSame rate at any length
Web searchPer request$0.014$0.01

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview$10
anthropic logoClaude Opus 4.5$22.50

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview$108$54 cached
anthropic logoClaude Opus 4.5$250$115 cached

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview$324$54 cached
anthropic logoClaude Opus 4.5$800$125 cached

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metricgoogle logoGemini 3.1 Pro Previewanthropic logoClaude Opus 4.5
Context window1.05M tokens200K tokens
Max output66K tokens64K tokens
Input typesAudio, File, Image, Text, VideoFile, Image, Text
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsHigh, Medium, LowNot available
Default reasoning effortMediumNot available
Release dateFebruary 19, 2026November 24, 2025

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metricgoogle logoGemini 3.1 Pro Previewanthropic logoClaude Opus 4.5
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputsSupportedSupported
JSON modeSupportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedSupported
TemperatureSupportedSupported
Stop sequencesSupportedSupported
Deterministic seedSupportedNot supported
Verbosity controlNot supportedSupported

Our take

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 2.3x cheaper for a typical chat. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (29.7 vs 29.1). Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the larger context window (1.05M vs 200K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Claude Opus 4.5 cheaper?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2 per 1M input tokens and $12 per 1M output tokens, while Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5 per 1M input tokens and $25 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Claude Opus 4.5?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 200K for Claude Opus 4.5.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview smarter than Claude Opus 4.5?

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 29.7 and Claude Opus 4.5 scores 29.1, putting Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.

Can I use Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Claude Opus 4.5 at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Claude Opus 4.5 answer side by side and keep the better response.

google logoanthropic logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Claude Opus 4.5 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.