AI model comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.

Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work, succeeding Claude Opus 5.

Input / 1M
$4
Output / 1M
$20
Context
1M

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google’s frontier reasoning model, delivering enhanced software engineering performance, improved agentic reliability, and more efficient token usage across complex workflows.

Input / 1M
$2
Output / 1M
$12
Context
1.05M

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

google logo

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

1.8x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

anthropic logo

Claude Opus 5.5

57.6 vs 29.7 on Artificial Analysis

Larger context window

google logo

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

1.05M vs 1M tokens

Newer release

anthropic logo

Claude Opus 5.5

Released September 22, 2026

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.557.6
google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview29.7

Coding index

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5Not available
google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview68.8

Agentic index

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5Not available
google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview8.2

Pricing

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metricanthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$4$2
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$20$12
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens$0.20$0.20
Cache writePer 1M tokens$5$0.38
Long-context pricingPer 1M tokens, for very long promptsSame rate at any length$4 in / $18 out above 200K
Web searchPer request$0.01$0.014

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5$18
google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview$10

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5$200$86 cached
google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview$108$54 cached

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5$640$70 cached
google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview$324$54 cached

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metricanthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Context window1M tokens1.05M tokens
Max output128K tokens66K tokens
Input typesFile, Image, TextAudio, File, Image, Text, Video
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsMax, Extra high, High, Medium, LowHigh, Medium, Low
Default reasoning effortHighMedium
Release dateSeptember 22, 2026February 19, 2026

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metricanthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputsSupportedSupported
JSON modeSupportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedSupported
TemperatureNot supportedSupported
Stop sequencesSupportedSupported
Deterministic seedNot supportedSupported
Verbosity controlSupportedNot supported

Our take

Opus 5.5 wins this one on the numbers that matter: it scores far higher on independent intelligence tests (57.6 vs 29.7) and is cheaper on output. Gemini 3.1 Pro is the fallback when you want Google's ecosystem, Search grounding, or a model that is still labeled preview.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview cheaper?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2 per 1M input tokens and $12 per 1M output tokens, while Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4 per 1M input tokens and $20 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 1M for Claude Opus 5.5.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 smarter than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Claude Opus 5.5 scores 57.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 29.7, putting Claude Opus 5.5 ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.

Can I use Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview answer side by side and keep the better response.

anthropic logogoogle logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.