AI model comparison
Muse Wonder vs Claude Opus 5.5
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
Muse Wonder is a frontier reasoning model from Meta, designed for complex personal and professional agentic tasks.
- Input / 1M
- $4
- Output / 1M
- $20
- Context
- 1.05M
Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work, succeeding Claude Opus 5.
- Input / 1M
- $4
- Output / 1M
- $20
- Context
- 1M
Comparing image generators? Compare image models
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
Tie
Same price for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Tie
Not enough benchmark data
Larger context window
Muse Wonder
1.05M vs 1M tokens
Newer release
Muse Wonder
Released October 12, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Claude Opus 5.557.6Coding index
Claude Opus 5.5Not availableAgentic index
Claude Opus 5.5Not availablePricing
Muse Wonder vs Claude Opus 5.5 API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $4 | $4 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $20 | $20 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.20 | $0.20 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | $5 |
| Web searchPer request | $0.0025 | $0.01 |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Claude Opus 5.5$18Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Claude Opus 5.5$200$86 cachedLong document summary
150K in, 2K out
Claude Opus 5.5$640$70 cachedSpecs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.05M tokens | 1M tokens |
| Max output | 944K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Input types | Audio, File, Image, Text, Video | File, Image, Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Max, Extra high, High, Medium, Low, Minimal | Max, Extra high, High, Medium, Low |
| Default reasoning effort | Medium | High |
| Release date | October 12, 2026 | September 22, 2026 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Not supported |
| Stop sequences | Not supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Not supported | Not supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
Claude Opus 5.5View full model details- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Hy4 preview
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Step 5 Preview
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.7
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Hy3
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Our take
Muse Wonder has the larger context window (1.05M vs 1M tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Wonder or Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper?
Muse Wonder and Claude Opus 5.5 cost the same for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Muse Wonder costs $4 per 1M input tokens and $20 per 1M output tokens, and Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4 per 1M input tokens and $20 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, Muse Wonder or Claude Opus 5.5?
Muse Wonder supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 1M for Claude Opus 5.5.
Can I use Muse Wonder and Claude Opus 5.5 at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Muse Wonder and Claude Opus 5.5 answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to Muse Wonder and Claude Opus 5.5 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.