AI model comparison

Muse Wonder vs Kimi K3

Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.

Muse Wonder is a frontier reasoning model from Meta, designed for complex personal and professional agentic tasks.

Input / 1M
$4
Output / 1M
$20
Context
1.05M

Kimi K3 is a 2.8T parameter open-weight multimodal reasoning model from Moonshot AI.

Input / 1M
$0.24
Output / 1M
$11.94
Context
1.05M

Comparing image generators? Compare image models

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

moonshotai logo

Kimi K3

2.8x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

Tie

Not enough benchmark data

Larger context window

Tie

1.05M vs 1.05M tokens

Newer release

meta logo

Muse Wonder

Released October 12, 2026

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

meta logoMuse WonderNot available
moonshotai logoKimi K343.6

Coding index

meta logoMuse WonderNot available
moonshotai logoKimi K376.2

Agentic index

meta logoMuse WonderNot available
moonshotai logoKimi K350

Pricing

Muse Wonder vs Kimi K3 API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metricmeta logoMuse Wondermoonshotai logoKimi K3
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$4$0.24
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$20$11.94
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens$0.20$0.21
Cache writePer 1M tokensNot availableNot available
Web searchPer request$0.0025Not available

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

meta logoMuse Wonder$18
moonshotai logoKimi K3$6.45

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

meta logoMuse Wonder$200$86 cached
moonshotai logoKimi K3$54.91$54.04 cached

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

meta logoMuse Wonder$640$70 cached
moonshotai logoKimi K3$59.72$55.37 cached

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metricmeta logoMuse Wondermoonshotai logoKimi K3
Context window1.05M tokens1.05M tokens
Max output944K tokens944K tokens
Input typesAudio, File, Image, Text, VideoImage, Text, Video
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsMax, Extra high, High, Medium, Low, MinimalMax, High, Low, None
Default reasoning effortMediumMax
Release dateOctober 12, 2026July 16, 2026

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metricmeta logoMuse Wondermoonshotai logoKimi K3
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputsSupportedSupported
JSON modeSupportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedSupported
TemperatureSupportedSupported
Stop sequencesNot supportedSupported
Deterministic seedNot supportedSupported
Verbosity controlNot supportedNot supported

Our take

Kimi K3 is 2.8x cheaper for a typical chat. The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Wonder or Kimi K3 cheaper?

Kimi K3 is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Kimi K3 costs $0.24 per 1M input tokens and $11.94 per 1M output tokens, while Muse Wonder costs $4 per 1M input tokens and $20 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, Muse Wonder or Kimi K3?

Muse Wonder supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 1.05M for Kimi K3.

Can I use Muse Wonder and Kimi K3 at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Muse Wonder and Kimi K3 answer side by side and keep the better response.

meta logomoonshotai logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to Muse Wonder and Kimi K3 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.