AI model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Solar Pro 4
Side by side comparison of MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Solar Pro 4 on pricing, benchmark scores, context window, and more.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the flagship foundation model developed by Xiaomi.
- Input / 1M
- $0.44
- Output / 1M
- $0.87
- Context
- 1.05M
Solar Pro 4 is Upstage's cost-efficient large language model, featuring a 524K context window.
- Input / 1M
- $0.15
- Output / 1M
- $0.60
- Context
- 524K
Comparing image generators? Compare image models
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
Solar Pro 4
2.2x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
29.9 vs 28.2 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.05M vs 524K tokens
Newer release
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Released September 21, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Coding index
Agentic index
Pricing
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Solar Pro 4 API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.44 | $0.15 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.87 | $0.60 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.00 | $0.03 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Long document summary
150K in, 2K out
Specs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.05M tokens | 524K tokens |
| Max output | 131K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Input types | Audio, Image, Text, Video | Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Not available | Max, Extra high, High, Medium, Low, Minimal, None |
| Default reasoning effort | Not available | Medium |
| Release date | September 21, 2026 | August 10, 2026 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Not supported |
| Deterministic seed | Supported | Not supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Our take
Solar Pro 4 is 2.2x cheaper for a typical chat. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (29.9 vs 28.2). MiMo-V2.6-Pro has the larger context window (1.05M vs 524K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Solar Pro 4 cheaper?
Solar Pro 4 is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Solar Pro 4 costs $0.15 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.44 per 1M input tokens and $0.87 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Solar Pro 4?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 524K for Solar Pro 4.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro smarter than Solar Pro 4?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 29.9 and Solar Pro 4 scores 28.2, putting MiMo-V2.6-Pro ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Solar Pro 4 at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Solar Pro 4 answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Solar Pro 4 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.