AI model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Side by side comparison of MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3.6 35B A3B on pricing, benchmark scores, context window, and more.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the flagship foundation model developed by Xiaomi.
- Input / 1M
- $0.44
- Output / 1M
- $0.87
- Context
- 1.05M
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is an open-weight multimodal model from Alibaba Cloud with 35 billion total parameters and 3 billion active parameters per token.
- Input / 1M
- $0.10
- Output / 1M
- $0.90
- Context
- 262K
Comparing image generators? Compare image models
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
2.0x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Not available
Not enough benchmark data
Larger context window
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.05M vs 262K tokens
Newer release
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Released September 21, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Coding index
Agentic index
Pricing
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.44 | $0.10 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.87 | $0.90 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.00 | $0.03 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Long document summary
150K in, 2K out
Specs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.05M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Max output | 131K tokens | 236K tokens |
| Input types | Audio, Image, Text, Video | Image, Text, Video |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Not available | Not available |
| Default reasoning effort | Not available | Not available |
| Release date | September 21, 2026 | April 27, 2026 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Our take
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 2.0x cheaper for a typical chat. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has the larger context window (1.05M vs 262K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.6 35B A3B cheaper?
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.90 per 1M output tokens, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.44 per 1M input tokens and $0.87 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 262K for Qwen3.6 35B A3B.
Can I use MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3.6 35B A3B at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3.6 35B A3B answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3.6 35B A3B at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.