AI model comparison
Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
Upstage
Solar Pro 3
Solar Pro 3 is Upstage's powerful Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model. With 102B total parameters and 12B active parameters per forward pass, it delivers exceptional performance while maintaining computational efficiency.
- Input / 1M
- $0.15
- Output / 1M
- $0.60
- Context
- 131K
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 is a 30.5B-parameter mixture-of-experts language model from Qwen, with 3.3B active parameters per inference.
- Input / 1M
- $0.10
- Output / 1M
- $0.30
- Context
- 262K
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
1.7x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Solar Pro 3
7.8 vs 7.5 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
262K vs 131K tokens
Newer release
Solar Pro 3
Released January 27, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 25077.5Coding index
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Not availableAgentic index
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Not availablePricing
Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.10 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.60 | $0.30 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.02 | Not available |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.35Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$4.20Long document summary
150K in, 2K out
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$15.60Specs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 131K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Max output | 118K tokens | 236K tokens |
| Input types | Text | Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | High, Medium, Low, Minimal, None | Not available |
| Default reasoning effort | Medium | Not available |
| Release date | January 27, 2026 | July 29, 2025 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Not supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Not supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Not supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507View full model details- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Flash
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Gemma 3 27B
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs GPT-4.1 Nano
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 32B
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Llama 4 Scout
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 14B
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Ministral 3 14B 2512
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Nova Lite 1.0
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 30B A3B
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Reka Flash 3
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Our take
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is 1.7x cheaper for a typical chat. Solar Pro 3 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (7.8 vs 7.5). Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has the larger context window (262K vs 131K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Solar Pro 3 or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 cheaper?
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.30 per 1M output tokens, while Solar Pro 3 costs $0.15 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, Solar Pro 3 or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 supports up to 262K tokens of context, compared with 131K for Solar Pro 3.
Is Solar Pro 3 smarter than Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Solar Pro 3 scores 7.8 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 scores 7.5, putting Solar Pro 3 ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use Solar Pro 3 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Solar Pro 3 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to Solar Pro 3 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.