AI model comparison
Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3 30B A3B
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
Upstage
Solar Pro 3
Solar Pro 3 is Upstage's powerful Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model. With 102B total parameters and 12B active parameters per forward pass, it delivers exceptional performance while maintaining computational efficiency.
- Input / 1M
- $0.15
- Output / 1M
- $0.60
- Context
- 131K
Qwen
Qwen3 30B A3B
Qwen3, the latest generation in the Qwen large language model series, features both dense and mixture-of-experts (MoE) architectures to excel in reasoning, multilingual support, and advanced agent tasks.
- Input / 1M
- $0.12
- Output / 1M
- $0.50
- Context
- 41K
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
Qwen3 30B A3B
1.2x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Solar Pro 3
7.8 vs 7.6 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
Solar Pro 3
131K vs 41K tokens
Newer release
Solar Pro 3
Released January 27, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Qwen3 30B A3B7.6Coding index
Qwen3 30B A3BNot availableAgentic index
Qwen3 30B A3BNot availablePricing
Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3 30B A3B API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | Qwen3 30B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.12 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.60 | $0.50 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.02 | Not available |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.49Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Qwen3 30B A3B$5.60Long document summary
150K in, 2K out
Qwen3 30B A3B$19Specs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | Qwen3 30B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 131K tokens | 41K tokens |
| Max output | 118K tokens | 16K tokens |
| Input types | Text | Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | High, Medium, Low, Minimal, None | Not available |
| Default reasoning effort | Medium | Not available |
| Release date | January 27, 2026 | April 28, 2025 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | Qwen3 30B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Not supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Not supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
- Solar Pro 3 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
- Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
- Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- Solar Pro 3 vs GPT-4.1 Nano
- Solar Pro 3 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
- Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
- Solar Pro 3 vs GPT-4o-mini
Qwen3 30B A3BView full model details- Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8 Flash
- Qwen3 30B A3B vs GPT-4o-mini
- Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
- Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
- Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen3 32B
- Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
- Qwen3 30B A3B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen3 14B
- Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- Qwen3 30B A3B vs GPT-4.1 Nano
- Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
- Qwen3 30B A3B vs Hermes 3 70B Instruct
- Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
- Qwen3 30B A3B vs Saba
Our take
Qwen3 30B A3B is 1.2x cheaper for a typical chat. Solar Pro 3 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (7.8 vs 7.6). Solar Pro 3 has the larger context window (131K vs 41K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Solar Pro 3 or Qwen3 30B A3B cheaper?
Qwen3 30B A3B is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.12 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens, while Solar Pro 3 costs $0.15 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, Solar Pro 3 or Qwen3 30B A3B?
Solar Pro 3 supports up to 131K tokens of context, compared with 41K for Qwen3 30B A3B.
Is Solar Pro 3 smarter than Qwen3 30B A3B?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Solar Pro 3 scores 7.8 and Qwen3 30B A3B scores 7.6, putting Solar Pro 3 ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use Solar Pro 3 and Qwen3 30B A3B at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Solar Pro 3 and Qwen3 30B A3B answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to Solar Pro 3 and Qwen3 30B A3B at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.