AI model comparison

o1 vs GPT-4 Turbo

Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.

openai logo

OpenAI

o1

The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding.

Input / 1M
$15
Output / 1M
$60
Context
200K

The latest GPT-4 Turbo model with vision capabilities. Vision requests can now use JSON mode and function calling.

Input / 1M
$10
Output / 1M
$30
Context
128K

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

openai logo

GPT-4 Turbo

1.7x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

openai logo

o1

15.2 vs 7 on Artificial Analysis

Larger context window

openai logo

o1

200K vs 128K tokens

Newer release

openai logo

o1

Released December 17, 2024

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

openai logoo115.2
openai logoGPT-4 Turbo7

Coding index

openai logoo139.7
openai logoGPT-4 Turbo21.5

Agentic index

openai logoo1Not available
openai logoGPT-4 TurboNot available

Pricing

o1 vs GPT-4 Turbo API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metricopenai logoo1openai logoGPT-4 Turbo
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$15$10
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$60$30
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens$7.50Not available
Cache writePer 1M tokensNot availableNot available
Web searchPer request$0.01Not available

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

openai logoo1$60
openai logoGPT-4 Turbo$35

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

openai logoo1$690$465 cached
openai logoGPT-4 Turbo$420

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

openai logoo1$2370$1245 cached
openai logoGPT-4 Turbo$1560

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metricopenai logoo1openai logoGPT-4 Turbo
Context window200K tokens128K tokens
Max output100K tokens4K tokens
Input typesFile, Image, TextImage, Text
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsNot availableNot available
Default reasoning effortNot availableNot available
Release dateDecember 17, 2024April 9, 2024

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metricopenai logoo1openai logoGPT-4 Turbo
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputsSupportedSupported
JSON modeSupportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedNot supported
TemperatureNot supportedSupported
Stop sequencesNot supportedSupported
Deterministic seedSupportedSupported
Verbosity controlNot supportedNot supported

Our take

GPT-4 Turbo is 1.7x cheaper for a typical chat. o1 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (15.2 vs 7). o1 has the larger context window (200K vs 128K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is o1 or GPT-4 Turbo cheaper?

GPT-4 Turbo is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). GPT-4 Turbo costs $10 per 1M input tokens and $30 per 1M output tokens, while o1 costs $15 per 1M input tokens and $60 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, o1 or GPT-4 Turbo?

o1 supports up to 200K tokens of context, compared with 128K for GPT-4 Turbo.

Is o1 smarter than GPT-4 Turbo?

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, o1 scores 15.2 and GPT-4 Turbo scores 7, putting o1 ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.

Can I use o1 and GPT-4 Turbo at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see o1 and GPT-4 Turbo answer side by side and keep the better response.

openai logoopenai logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to o1 and GPT-4 Turbo at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.