AI model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs o1
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
Mistral
Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral Medium 3.5 is a dense 128B instruction-following model from Mistral AI.
- Input / 1M
- $1.50
- Output / 1M
- $7.50
- Context
- 262K
OpenAI
o1
The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding.
- Input / 1M
- $15
- Output / 1M
- $60
- Context
- 200K
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
Mistral Medium 3.5
8.9x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
o1
15.2 vs 14.2 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
Mistral Medium 3.5
262K vs 200K tokens
Newer release
Mistral Medium 3.5
Released April 30, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Mistral Medium 3.514.2o115.2Coding index
Mistral Medium 3.546.9o139.7Agentic index
Mistral Medium 3.57o1Not availablePricing
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs o1 API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3.5 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $1.50 | $15 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $7.50 | $60 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | Not available | $7.50 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
| Web searchPer request | Not available | $0.01 |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Mistral Medium 3.5$6.75o1$60Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Mistral Medium 3.5$75o1$690$465 cachedLong document summary
150K in, 2K out
Mistral Medium 3.5$240o1$2370$1245 cachedSpecs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3.5 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 262K tokens | 200K tokens |
| Max output | 210K tokens | 100K tokens |
| Input types | File, Image, Text | File, Image, Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | High, None | Not available |
| Default reasoning effort | High | Not available |
| Release date | April 30, 2026 | December 17, 2024 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3.5 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Not supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Not supported |
| Deterministic seed | Supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
Mistral Medium 3.5View full model details- Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
- Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
- Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- Mistral Medium 3.5 vs o4 Mini
- Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
- Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Command A
- Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-4.1
- Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
- Mistral Medium 3.5 vs o3 Mini
- Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Sonar Reasoning Pro
Our take
Mistral Medium 3.5 is 8.9x cheaper for a typical chat. o1 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (15.2 vs 14.2). Mistral Medium 3.5 has the larger context window (262K vs 200K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or o1 cheaper?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 per 1M input tokens and $7.50 per 1M output tokens, while o1 costs $15 per 1M input tokens and $60 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 or o1?
Mistral Medium 3.5 supports up to 262K tokens of context, compared with 200K for o1.
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 smarter than o1?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Mistral Medium 3.5 scores 14.2 and o1 scores 15.2, putting o1 ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use Mistral Medium 3.5 and o1 at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Mistral Medium 3.5 and o1 answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to Mistral Medium 3.5 and o1 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.