AI model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemma 4 31B

Side by side comparison of MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Gemma 4 31B on pricing, benchmark scores, context window, and more.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is an open-source foundation model developed by Xiaomi.

Input / 1M
$0.14
Output / 1M
$0.28
Context
1.05M

Gemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output.

Input / 1M
$0.20
Output / 1M
$0.40
Context
262K

Comparing image generators? Compare image models

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

xiaomi logo

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

1.4x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

Not available

Not enough benchmark data

Larger context window

xiaomi logo

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

1.05M vs 262K tokens

Newer release

xiaomi logo

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Released September 21, 2026

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

xiaomi logoMiMo-V2.6-Flash26.7
google logoGemma 4 31BNot available

Coding index

xiaomi logoMiMo-V2.6-FlashNot available
google logoGemma 4 31B43.4

Agentic index

xiaomi logoMiMo-V2.6-FlashNot available
google logoGemma 4 31B4.2

Pricing

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemma 4 31B API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metricxiaomi logoMiMo-V2.6-Flashgoogle logoGemma 4 31B
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$0.14$0.20
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$0.28$0.40
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens$0.00Not available
Cache writePer 1M tokensNot availableNot available

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

xiaomi logoMiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.42
google logoGemma 4 31B$0.60

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

xiaomi logoMiMo-V2.6-Flash$5.32$1.20 cached
google logoGemma 4 31B$7.60

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

xiaomi logoMiMo-V2.6-Flash$21.56$0.98 cached
google logoGemma 4 31B$30.80

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metricxiaomi logoMiMo-V2.6-Flashgoogle logoGemma 4 31B
Context window1.05M tokens262K tokens
Max output131K tokens16K tokens
Input typesAudio, Image, Text, VideoImage, Text, Video
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsNot availableNot available
Default reasoning effortNot availableNot available
Release dateSeptember 21, 2026April 2, 2026

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metricxiaomi logoMiMo-V2.6-Flashgoogle logoGemma 4 31B
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputsSupportedSupported
JSON modeSupportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedSupported
TemperatureSupportedSupported
Stop sequencesSupportedSupported
Deterministic seedSupportedSupported
Verbosity controlNot supportedNot supported

Our take

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 1.4x cheaper for a typical chat. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.05M vs 262K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 per 1M input tokens and $0.28 per 1M output tokens, while Gemma 4 31B costs $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Gemma 4 31B?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 262K for Gemma 4 31B.

Can I use MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Gemma 4 31B at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Gemma 4 31B answer side by side and keep the better response.

xiaomi logogoogle logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Gemma 4 31B at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.