AI model comparison

Hy3 vs Gemma 4 31B

Side by side comparison of Hy3 and Gemma 4 31B on pricing, benchmark scores, context window, and more.

Hy3 is a 295B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model from Tencent (21B active, 192 experts with top-8 routing) built for reasoning, agentic workflows, and real-world production use.

Input / 1M
$0.13
Output / 1M
$0.53
Context
262K

Gemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output.

Input / 1M
$0.20
Output / 1M
$0.40
Context
262K

Comparing image generators? Compare image models

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

tencent logo

Hy3

1.1x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

Not available

Not enough benchmark data

Larger context window

Tie

262K vs 262K tokens

Newer release

tencent logo

Hy3

Released July 6, 2026

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

tencent logoHy3Not available
google logoGemma 4 31BNot available

Coding index

tencent logoHy358.8
google logoGemma 4 31B43.4

Agentic index

tencent logoHy324.1
google logoGemma 4 31B4.2

Pricing

Hy3 vs Gemma 4 31B API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metrictencent logoHy3google logoGemma 4 31B
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$0.13$0.20
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$0.53$0.40
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens$0.03Not available
Cache writePer 1M tokensNot availableNot available

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

tencent logoHy3$0.53
google logoGemma 4 31B$0.60

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

tencent logoHy3$6.07$3.10 cached
google logoGemma 4 31B$7.60

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

tencent logoHy3$20.86$6.01 cached
google logoGemma 4 31B$30.80

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metrictencent logoHy3google logoGemma 4 31B
Context window262K tokens262K tokens
Max output128K tokens16K tokens
Input typesTextImage, Text, Video
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsHigh, Low, NoneNot available
Default reasoning effortHighNot available
Release dateJuly 6, 2026April 2, 2026

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metrictencent logoHy3google logoGemma 4 31B
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputsSupportedSupported
JSON modeSupportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedSupported
TemperatureSupportedSupported
Stop sequencesSupportedSupported
Deterministic seedSupportedSupported
Verbosity controlNot supportedNot supported

Our take

Hy3 is 1.1x cheaper for a typical chat. The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 or Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

Hy3 is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Hy3 costs $0.13 per 1M input tokens and $0.53 per 1M output tokens, while Gemma 4 31B costs $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, Hy3 or Gemma 4 31B?

Hy3 supports up to 262K tokens of context, compared with 262K for Gemma 4 31B.

Can I use Hy3 and Gemma 4 31B at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Hy3 and Gemma 4 31B answer side by side and keep the better response.

tencent logogoogle logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to Hy3 and Gemma 4 31B at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.