AI model comparison

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Solar Mini 4

Side by side comparison of Ling 3.1 Flash and Solar Mini 4 on pricing, benchmark scores, context window, and more.

Ling 3.1 Flash is a hybrid reasoning mixture-of-experts model from inclusionAI, with 25B active parameters out of 560B total.

Input / 1M: $0.08
Output / 1M: $0.22
Context: 1M

Solar Mini 4 is Upstage's compact, cost-efficient language model, a 35B-parameter mixture-of-experts with 3B active parameters and a 524K context window.

Input / 1M: $0.05
Output / 1M: $0.20
Context: 524K

Comparing image generators? Compare image models

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

Solar Mini 4

1.3x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

Not available

Not enough benchmark data

Larger context window

Ling 3.1 Flash

1M vs 524K tokens

Newer release

Ling 3.1 Flash

Released October 2, 2026

Pricing

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Solar Mini 4 API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metric	Ling 3.1 Flash	Solar Mini 4
Input tokensPer 1M tokens	$0.08	$0.05
Output tokensPer 1M tokens	$0.22	$0.20
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens	$0.02	$0.01
Cache writePer 1M tokens	Not available	Not available

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

Ling 3.1 Flash$0.26

Solar Mini 4$0.20

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

Ling 3.1 Flash$3.15$1.35 cached

Solar Mini 4$2.30$0.95 cached

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

Ling 3.1 Flash$11.70$2.70 cached

Solar Mini 4$7.90$1.15 cached

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metric	Ling 3.1 Flash	Solar Mini 4
Context window	1M tokens	524K tokens
Max output	262K tokens	131K tokens
Input types	Text	Text
Output types	Text	Text
Reasoning effort levels	Not available	Max, Extra high, High, Medium, Low, Minimal, None
Default reasoning effort	Not available	Medium
Release date	October 2, 2026	September 23, 2026

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metric	Ling 3.1 Flash	Solar Mini 4
Tool calling	Supported	Supported
Structured outputs	Supported	Supported
JSON mode	Supported	Supported
Reasoning	Supported	Supported
Temperature	Supported	Supported
Stop sequences	Supported	Not supported
Deterministic seed	Supported	Not supported
Verbosity control	Not supported	Not supported

Our take

Solar Mini 4 is 1.3x cheaper for a typical chat. Ling 3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 524K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Ling 3.1 Flash or Solar Mini 4 cheaper?

Solar Mini 4 is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05 per 1M input tokens and $0.20 per 1M output tokens, while Ling 3.1 Flash costs $0.08 per 1M input tokens and $0.22 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, Ling 3.1 Flash or Solar Mini 4?

Ling 3.1 Flash supports up to 1M tokens of context, compared with 524K for Solar Mini 4.

Can I use Ling 3.1 Flash and Solar Mini 4 at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Ling 3.1 Flash and Solar Mini 4 answer side by side and keep the better response.

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to Ling 3.1 Flash and Solar Mini 4 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.

Get started See a preview