AI model comparison
Ling 3.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
inclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash is a hybrid reasoning mixture-of-experts model from inclusionAI, with 25B active parameters out of 560B total.
- Input / 1M
- $0.08
- Output / 1M
- $0.22
- Context
- 262K
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is the cost-efficient contributor tier of Meta’s multimodal reasoning model for experimentation, learning, and early-stage agentic, multi-agent, and coding workflows.
- Input / 1M
- $0.10
- Output / 1M
- $0.20
- Context
- 1.05M
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
Ling 3.1 Flash
1.1x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Tie
Not enough benchmark data
Larger context window
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
1.05M vs 262K tokens
Newer release
Ling 3.1 Flash
Released October 2, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Coding index
Agentic index
Pricing
Ling 3.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.08 | $0.10 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.22 | $0.20 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.02 | $0.00 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
| Web searchPer request | Not available | $0.0025 |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Long document summary
150K in, 2K out
Specs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 262K tokens | 1.05M tokens |
| Max output | 236K tokens | 944K tokens |
| Input types | Text | File, Image, Text, Video |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Not available | Max, Extra high, High, Medium, Low, Minimal |
| Default reasoning effort | Not available | Medium |
| Release date | October 2, 2026 | September 2, 2026 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Not supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Not supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Not supported |
| Deterministic seed | Supported | Not supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Step 5 Preview
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs GLM 5.3 Flash
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Hy4 preview
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs GPT-6 Luna
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs GLM 5.3
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Hy3
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Solar Mini 4
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs MiMo-V2.5
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs gpt-oss-120b
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Qwen3.7 Flash
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Mistral Nemo
Our take
Ling 3.1 Flash is 1.1x cheaper for a typical chat. Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor has the larger context window (1.05M vs 262K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Ling 3.1 Flash or Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor cheaper?
Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Ling 3.1 Flash costs $0.08 per 1M input tokens and $0.22 per 1M output tokens, while Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.20 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, Ling 3.1 Flash or Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor?
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 262K for Ling 3.1 Flash.
Can I use Ling 3.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Ling 3.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to Ling 3.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.