AI model comparison
GPT-4.1 Nano vs Gemma 3 27B
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano
For tasks that demand low latency, GPT‑4.1 nano is the fastest and cheapest model in the GPT-4.1 series.
- Input / 1M
- $0.10
- Output / 1M
- $0.40
- Context
- 1.05M
Gemma 3 27B
Gemma 3 introduces multimodality, supporting vision-language input and text outputs.
- Input / 1M
- $0.08
- Output / 1M
- $0.45
- Context
- 131K
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
Gemma 3 27B
1.0x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
GPT-4.1 Nano
7.8 vs 4.9 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
GPT-4.1 Nano
1.05M vs 131K tokens
Newer release
GPT-4.1 Nano
Released April 14, 2025
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
GPT-4.1 Nano7.8Gemma 3 27B4.9Coding index
GPT-4.1 Nano11.1Gemma 3 27B10.1Agentic index
GPT-4.1 NanoNot availableGemma 3 27B0.1Pricing
GPT-4.1 Nano vs Gemma 3 27B API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | GPT-4.1 Nano | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.10 | $0.08 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.40 | $0.45 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.03 | $0.04 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
| Web searchPer request | $0.01 | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
GPT-4.1 Nano$0.40Gemma 3 27B$0.39Coding task
30K in, 4K out
GPT-4.1 Nano$4.60$2.35 cachedGemma 3 27B$4.20$3 cachedLong document summary
150K in, 2K out
GPT-4.1 Nano$15.80$4.55 cachedGemma 3 27B$12.90$6.90 cachedSpecs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | GPT-4.1 Nano | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.05M tokens | 131K tokens |
| Max output | 33K tokens | 118K tokens |
| Input types | File, Image, Text | Image, Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Not available | Not available |
| Default reasoning effort | Not available | Not available |
| Release date | April 14, 2025 | March 12, 2025 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | GPT-4.1 Nano | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Not supported | Not supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Not supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
GPT-4.1 NanoView full model details- GPT-4.1 Nano vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna Pro
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs gpt-oss-120b
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs gpt-oss-20b
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-4o-mini
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-5 Nano
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 4 Scout
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs Solar Pro 3
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3 30B A3B
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs Nova Lite 1.0
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
- GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Gemma 3 27BView full model details- Gemma 3 27B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
- Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-4o-mini
- Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
- Gemma 3 27B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- Gemma 3 27B vs Gemma 3 12B
- Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- Gemma 3 27B vs Hermes 3 70B Instruct
- Gemma 3 27B vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
- Gemma 3 27B vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
- Gemma 3 27B vs Gemma 3 4B
- Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
- Gemma 3 27B vs Saba
- Gemma 3 27B vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Our take
Gemma 3 27B is 1.0x cheaper for a typical chat. GPT-4.1 Nano scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (7.8 vs 4.9). GPT-4.1 Nano has the larger context window (1.05M vs 131K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 Nano or Gemma 3 27B cheaper?
Gemma 3 27B is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Gemma 3 27B costs $0.08 per 1M input tokens and $0.45 per 1M output tokens, while GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, GPT-4.1 Nano or Gemma 3 27B?
GPT-4.1 Nano supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 131K for Gemma 3 27B.
Is GPT-4.1 Nano smarter than Gemma 3 27B?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, GPT-4.1 Nano scores 7.8 and Gemma 3 27B scores 4.9, putting GPT-4.1 Nano ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use GPT-4.1 Nano and Gemma 3 27B at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see GPT-4.1 Nano and Gemma 3 27B answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to GPT-4.1 Nano and Gemma 3 27B at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.