AI model comparison
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is a sparse mixture-of-experts model from DeepSeek, and the first built on the company's Causal Encoder-Decoder (CED) architecture.
- Input / 1M
- $0.30
- Output / 1M
- $1.20
- Context
- 1.05M
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is an open-weight sparse mixture-of-experts model from Qwen and the open-weight variant of [Qwen3.8 Max](/qwen/qwen3.8-max), with 95 billion active parameters out of 2.4 trillion total.
- Input / 1M
- $2
- Output / 1M
- $6
- Context
- 1.05M
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
5.8x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
39.9 vs 39.5 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
Tie
1.05M vs 1.05M tokens
Newer release
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Released September 10, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash39.5Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B39.9Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashNot availableQwen3.8 2.4T A95B71.9Agentic index
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashNot availableQwen3.8 2.4T A95B50.1Pricing
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.30 | $2 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $1.20 | $6 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.01 | $0.25 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$1.20Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$7Coding task
30K in, 4K out
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$13.80$4.98 cachedQwen3.8 2.4T A95B$84$31.50 cachedLong document summary
150K in, 2K out
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$47.40$3.30 cachedQwen3.8 2.4T A95B$312$49.50 cachedSpecs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.05M tokens | 1.05M tokens |
| Max output | 944K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Input types | Image, Text | Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Max, High, Low | Extra high, Medium, Low |
| Default reasoning effort | High | Extra high |
| Release date | September 10, 2026 | August 12, 2026 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashView full model details- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Hy4 preview
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Step 5 Preview
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Hy3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Opus 5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna Pro
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.6
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling 3.1 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Terra
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.8
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.7
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5.4
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BView full model details- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GLM 5.3
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Kimi K3
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-5.6 Terra
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Muse Spark 1.2
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Grok 4.5
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Claude Sonnet 5
Our take
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 5.8x cheaper for a typical chat. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (39.9 vs 39.5). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cheaper?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $1.20 per 1M output tokens, while Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2 per 1M input tokens and $6 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 1.05M for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash smarter than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores 39.5 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores 39.9, putting Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.