AI model comparison
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
Z.ai
GLM 5.3 FlashX
GLM-5.3-FlashX is the high-speed variant of Z.ai's GLM-5.3-Flash, a native multimodal model delivering inference speeds of up to 200 tokens/s.
- Input / 1M
- $0.37
- Output / 1M
- $1.25
- Context
- 1.05M
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is a sparse mixture-of-experts model from DeepSeek, and the first built on the company's Causal Encoder-Decoder (CED) architecture.
- Input / 1M
- $0.30
- Output / 1M
- $1.20
- Context
- 1.05M
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
1.1x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Tie
Not enough benchmark data
Larger context window
Tie
1.05M vs 1.05M tokens
Newer release
GLM 5.3 FlashX
Released September 18, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Coding index
Agentic index
Pricing
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.37 | $0.30 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $1.25 | $1.20 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.09 | $0.01 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Long document summary
150K in, 2K out
Specs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.05M tokens | 1.05M tokens |
| Max output | 131K tokens | 944K tokens |
| Input types | Image, Text, Video | Image, Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Max, High, Low | Max, High, Low |
| Default reasoning effort | Max | High |
| Release date | September 18, 2026 | September 10, 2026 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Not supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Not supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Not supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Our take
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 1.1x cheaper for a typical chat. The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM 5.3 FlashX or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $1.20 per 1M output tokens, while GLM 5.3 FlashX costs $0.37 per 1M input tokens and $1.25 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, GLM 5.3 FlashX or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
GLM 5.3 FlashX supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 1.05M for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.
Can I use GLM 5.3 FlashX and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see GLM 5.3 FlashX and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to GLM 5.3 FlashX and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.