AI model comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.

Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work, succeeding Claude Opus 5.

Input / 1M
$4
Output / 1M
$20
Context
1M

DeepSeek V4 Flash is an efficiency-optimized Mixture-of-Experts model from DeepSeek with 284B total parameters and 13B activated parameters, supporting a 1M-token context window.

Input / 1M
$0.01
Output / 1M
$1.28
Context
1.05M

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

deepseek logo

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

27.3x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

anthropic logo

Claude Opus 5.5

57.6 vs 24.4 on Artificial Analysis

Larger context window

deepseek logo

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

1.05M vs 1M tokens

Newer release

anthropic logo

Claude Opus 5.5

Released September 22, 2026

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.557.6
deepseek logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 042324.4

Coding index

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5Not available
deepseek logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 042352

Agentic index

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5Not available
deepseek logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 042326.3

Pricing

Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metricanthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5deepseek logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$4$0.01
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$20$1.28
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens$0.20$0.01
Cache writePer 1M tokens$5Not available
Web searchPer request$0.01Not available

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5$18
deepseek logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423$0.66

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5$200$86 cached
deepseek logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423$5.42$5.42 cached

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5$640$70 cached
deepseek logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423$4.05$4.05 cached

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metricanthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5deepseek logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Context window1M tokens1.05M tokens
Max output128K tokens944K tokens
Input typesFile, Image, TextText
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsMax, Extra high, High, Medium, LowExtra high, High
Default reasoning effortHighHigh
Release dateSeptember 22, 2026April 24, 2026

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metricanthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5deepseek logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputsSupportedSupported
JSON modeSupportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedSupported
TemperatureNot supportedSupported
Stop sequencesSupportedSupported
Deterministic seedNot supportedSupported
Verbosity controlSupportedNot supported

Our take

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is 27.3x cheaper for a typical chat. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (57.6 vs 24.4). DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has the larger context window (1.05M vs 1M tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 cheaper?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs $0.01 per 1M input tokens and $1.28 per 1M output tokens, while Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4 per 1M input tokens and $20 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 1M for Claude Opus 5.5.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 smarter than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423?

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Claude Opus 5.5 scores 57.6 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 scores 24.4, putting Claude Opus 5.5 ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.

Can I use Claude Opus 5.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Claude Opus 5.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 answer side by side and keep the better response.

anthropic logodeepseek logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to Claude Opus 5.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.