AI model comparison
Trinity Large Thinking vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
Arcee AI
Trinity Large Thinking
Trinity Large Thinking is a powerful open source reasoning model from the team at Arcee AI. It shows strong performance in PinchBench, agentic workloads, and reasoning tasks.
- Input / 1M
- $0.25
- Output / 1M
- $0.80
- Context
- 262K
Qwen
Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3-Coder-Next is an open-weight causal language model optimized for coding agents and local development workflows.
- Input / 1M
- $0.12
- Output / 1M
- $0.80
- Context
- 262K
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
Qwen3 Coder Next
1.4x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Trinity Large Thinking
10.8 vs 9.2 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
Tie
262K vs 262K tokens
Newer release
Trinity Large Thinking
Released April 1, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Qwen3 Coder Next9.2Coding index
Qwen3 Coder Next36.2Agentic index
Qwen3 Coder Next0.9Pricing
Trinity Large Thinking vs Qwen3 Coder Next API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.25 | $0.12 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.80 | $0.80 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.06 | $0.07 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.64Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Qwen3 Coder Next$6.80$5.30 cachedLong document summary
150K in, 2K out
Qwen3 Coder Next$19.60$12.10 cachedSpecs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 262K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Max output | 80K tokens | 236K tokens |
| Input types | Text | Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Not available | Not available |
| Default reasoning effort | Not available | Not available |
| Release date | April 1, 2026 | February 4, 2026 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Not supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Not supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Not supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Not supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Not supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
- Trinity Large Thinking vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
- Trinity Large Thinking vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
- Trinity Large Thinking vs Mistral Small 4
- Trinity Large Thinking vs GLM 4.6V
- Trinity Large Thinking vs GLM 4.5 Air
- Trinity Large Thinking vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
- Trinity Large Thinking vs GPT-4.1 Mini
- Trinity Large Thinking vs Llama 4 Maverick
- Trinity Large Thinking vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Qwen3 Coder NextView full model details- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek V3 0324
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Llama 4 Maverick
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 32B
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs GLM 4.5 Air
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 14B
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Mistral Medium 3.1
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Mistral Large 3 2512
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Mistral Medium 3
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Devstral 2 2512
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Solar Pro 3
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Sonar
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 30B A3B
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Hermes 3 70B Instruct
- Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Our take
Qwen3 Coder Next is 1.4x cheaper for a typical chat. Trinity Large Thinking scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (10.8 vs 9.2). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Trinity Large Thinking or Qwen3 Coder Next cheaper?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Qwen3 Coder Next costs $0.12 per 1M input tokens and $0.80 per 1M output tokens, while Trinity Large Thinking costs $0.25 per 1M input tokens and $0.80 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, Trinity Large Thinking or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Trinity Large Thinking supports up to 262K tokens of context, compared with 262K for Qwen3 Coder Next.
Is Trinity Large Thinking smarter than Qwen3 Coder Next?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Trinity Large Thinking scores 10.8 and Qwen3 Coder Next scores 9.2, putting Trinity Large Thinking ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use Trinity Large Thinking and Qwen3 Coder Next at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Trinity Large Thinking and Qwen3 Coder Next answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to Trinity Large Thinking and Qwen3 Coder Next at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.