AI model comparison
Solar Pro 4 vs MiMo-V2.5
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
Upstage
Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 4 is Upstage's cost-efficient large language model, featuring a 524K context window.
- Input / 1M
- $0.09
- Output / 1M
- $0.36
- Context
- 524K
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 is a native omnimodal model by Xiaomi.
- Input / 1M
- $0.14
- Output / 1M
- $0.28
- Context
- 1.05M
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
Solar Pro 4
1.2x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Solar Pro 4
28.2 vs 25.2 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
MiMo-V2.5
1.05M vs 524K tokens
Newer release
Solar Pro 4
Released August 10, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Coding index
Agentic index
Pricing
Solar Pro 4 vs MiMo-V2.5 API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.09 | $0.14 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.36 | $0.28 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.02 | $0.00 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Long document summary
150K in, 2K out
Specs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 524K tokens | 1.05M tokens |
| Max output | 131K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Input types | Text | Audio, Image, Text, Video |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Max, Extra high, High, Medium, Low, Minimal, None | Not available |
| Default reasoning effort | Medium | Not available |
| Release date | August 10, 2026 | April 22, 2026 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Not supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Not supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
- Solar Pro 4 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
- Solar Pro 4 vs GPT-6 Luna
- Solar Pro 4 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
- Solar Pro 4 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
- Solar Pro 4 vs Hy3
- Solar Pro 4 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
- Solar Pro 4 vs MiniMax M3
- Solar Pro 4 vs Solar Mini 4
- Solar Pro 4 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
- Solar Pro 4 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Solar Pro 4 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL
- Solar Pro 4 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
- MiMo-V2.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
- MiMo-V2.5 vs Hy3
- MiMo-V2.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
- MiMo-V2.5 vs Solar Mini 4
- MiMo-V2.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
- MiMo-V2.5 vs DeepSeek V3.2
- MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- MiMo-V2.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash
- MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
- MiMo-V2.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL
- MiMo-V2.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Our take
Solar Pro 4 is 1.2x cheaper for a typical chat. Solar Pro 4 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (28.2 vs 25.2). MiMo-V2.5 has the larger context window (1.05M vs 524K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Solar Pro 4 or MiMo-V2.5 cheaper?
Solar Pro 4 is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Solar Pro 4 costs $0.09 per 1M input tokens and $0.36 per 1M output tokens, while MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.14 per 1M input tokens and $0.28 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, Solar Pro 4 or MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 524K for Solar Pro 4.
Is Solar Pro 4 smarter than MiMo-V2.5?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Solar Pro 4 scores 28.2 and MiMo-V2.5 scores 25.2, putting Solar Pro 4 ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use Solar Pro 4 and MiMo-V2.5 at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Solar Pro 4 and MiMo-V2.5 answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to Solar Pro 4 and MiMo-V2.5 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.