AI model comparison
Qwen3 32B vs Reka Flash 3
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
Qwen
Qwen3 32B
Qwen3-32B is a dense 32.8B parameter causal language model from the Qwen3 series, optimized for both complex reasoning and efficient dialogue.
- Input / 1M
- $0.08
- Output / 1M
- $0.28
- Context
- 131K
rekaai
Reka Flash 3
Reka Flash 3 is a general-purpose, instruction-tuned large language model with 21 billion parameters, developed by Reka. It excels at general chat, coding tasks, instruction-following, and function calling.
- Input / 1M
- $0.10
- Output / 1M
- $0.20
- Context
- 66K
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
Reka Flash 3
1.0x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Qwen3 32B
7.3 vs 6.4 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
Qwen3 32B
131K vs 66K tokens
Newer release
Qwen3 32B
Released April 28, 2025
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Qwen3 32B7.3Reka Flash 36.4Coding index
Qwen3 32BNot availableReka Flash 3Not availableAgentic index
Qwen3 32BNot availableReka Flash 3Not availablePricing
Qwen3 32B vs Reka Flash 3 API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | Qwen3 32B | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.08 | $0.10 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.28 | $0.20 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Qwen3 32B$0.30Reka Flash 3$0.30Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Qwen3 32B$3.52Reka Flash 3$3.80Long document summary
150K in, 2K out
Qwen3 32B$12.56Reka Flash 3$15.40Specs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | Qwen3 32B | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 131K tokens | 66K tokens |
| Max output | 16K tokens | 59K tokens |
| Input types | Text | Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Not available | Not available |
| Default reasoning effort | Not available | Not available |
| Release date | April 28, 2025 | March 12, 2025 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | Qwen3 32B | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Not supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Not supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
Qwen3 32BView full model details- Qwen3 32B vs GPT-4o-mini
- Qwen3 32B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- Qwen3 32B vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
- Qwen3 32B vs Llama 4 Scout
- Qwen3 32B vs GPT-4.1 Nano
- Qwen3 32B vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
- Qwen3 32B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- Qwen3 32B vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
- Qwen3 32B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Qwen3 32B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- Qwen3 32B vs Qwen3 30B A3B
- Qwen3 32B vs Qwen3 14B
- Qwen3 32B vs Nova Lite 1.0
- Qwen3 32B vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Our take
Reka Flash 3 is 1.0x cheaper for a typical chat. Qwen3 32B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (7.3 vs 6.4). Qwen3 32B has the larger context window (131K vs 66K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3 32B or Reka Flash 3 cheaper?
Reka Flash 3 is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Reka Flash 3 costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.20 per 1M output tokens, while Qwen3 32B costs $0.08 per 1M input tokens and $0.28 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, Qwen3 32B or Reka Flash 3?
Qwen3 32B supports up to 131K tokens of context, compared with 66K for Reka Flash 3.
Is Qwen3 32B smarter than Reka Flash 3?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Qwen3 32B scores 7.3 and Reka Flash 3 scores 6.4, putting Qwen3 32B ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use Qwen3 32B and Reka Flash 3 at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Qwen3 32B and Reka Flash 3 answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to Qwen3 32B and Reka Flash 3 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.