AI model comparison

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Sonar Reasoning Pro

Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is a high-performance, open-weight Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model optimized for complex reasoning tasks.

Input / 1M
$0.45
Output / 1M
$3.50
Context
128K

Note: Sonar Pro pricing includes Perplexity search pricing. See [details here](https://docs.perplexity.ai/guides/pricing#detailed-pricing-breakdown-for-sonar-reasoning-pro-and-sonar-pro) Sonar Reasoning Pro is a premier reasoning model powered by DeepSeek R1 with Chain of Thought (CoT).

Input / 1M
$2
Output / 1M
$8
Context
128K

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

qwen logo

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

3.0x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

qwen logo

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

12.7 vs 11.8 on Artificial Analysis

Larger context window

Tie

128K vs 128K tokens

Newer release

qwen logo

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Released July 25, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 250712.7
perplexity logoSonar Reasoning Pro11.8

Coding index

qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 250722.1
perplexity logoSonar Reasoning ProNot available

Agentic index

qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25071.3
perplexity logoSonar Reasoning ProNot available

Pricing

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Sonar Reasoning Pro API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metricqwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507perplexity logoSonar Reasoning Pro
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$0.45$2
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$3.50$8
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokensNot availableNot available
Cache writePer 1M tokensNot availableNot available
Web searchPer requestNot available$0.005

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$2.65
perplexity logoSonar Reasoning Pro$8

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$27.50
perplexity logoSonar Reasoning Pro$92

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

qwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$74.50
perplexity logoSonar Reasoning Pro$316

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metricqwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507perplexity logoSonar Reasoning Pro
Context window128K tokens128K tokens
Max output16K tokens115K tokens
Input typesTextImage, Text
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsNot availableNot available
Default reasoning effortNot availableNot available
Release dateJuly 25, 2025March 7, 2025

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metricqwen logoQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507perplexity logoSonar Reasoning Pro
Tool callingSupportedNot supported
Structured outputsNot supportedNot supported
JSON modeNot supportedNot supported
ReasoningSupportedSupported
TemperatureSupportedSupported
Stop sequencesSupportedNot supported
Deterministic seedNot supportedNot supported
Verbosity controlNot supportedNot supported

Our take

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 3.0x cheaper for a typical chat. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (12.7 vs 11.8). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Sonar Reasoning Pro cheaper?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 per 1M input tokens and $3.50 per 1M output tokens, while Sonar Reasoning Pro costs $2 per 1M input tokens and $8 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Sonar Reasoning Pro?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 supports up to 128K tokens of context, compared with 128K for Sonar Reasoning Pro.

Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 smarter than Sonar Reasoning Pro?

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 scores 12.7 and Sonar Reasoning Pro scores 11.8, putting Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.

Can I use Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Sonar Reasoning Pro at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Sonar Reasoning Pro answer side by side and keep the better response.

qwen logoperplexity logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Sonar Reasoning Pro at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.