AI model comparison
Muse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-5.4 Nano
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
Meta
Muse Glimmer 30B
Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense, open-weight multimodal model from Meta Superintelligence Labs, distilled from Muse Spark and optimized for autonomous agents on consumer hardware.
- Input / 1M
- $0.30
- Output / 1M
- $1.20
- Context
- 131K
OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Nano
GPT-5.4 nano is the most lightweight and cost-efficient variant of the GPT-5.4 family, optimized for speed-critical and high-volume tasks.
- Input / 1M
- $0.20
- Output / 1M
- $1.25
- Context
- 400K
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
GPT-5.4 Nano
1.2x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
GPT-5.4 Nano
20.7 vs 17.5 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
GPT-5.4 Nano
400K vs 131K tokens
Newer release
Muse Glimmer 30B
Released August 9, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
GPT-5.4 Nano20.7Coding index
GPT-5.4 Nano56.1Agentic index
GPT-5.4 Nano16Pricing
Muse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-5.4 Nano API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.20 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $1.20 | $1.25 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.04 | $0.02 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
| Web searchPer request | Not available | $0.01 |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
GPT-5.4 Nano$1.02Coding task
30K in, 4K out
GPT-5.4 Nano$11$5.60 cachedLong document summary
150K in, 2K out
GPT-5.4 Nano$32.50$5.50 cachedSpecs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 131K tokens | 400K tokens |
| Max output | 16K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Input types | Image, Text | File, Image, Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Extra high, High, Medium, Low | Extra high, High, Medium, Low, None |
| Default reasoning effort | Medium | Medium |
| Release date | August 9, 2026 | March 17, 2026 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Not supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Not supported |
| Deterministic seed | Supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs LongCat 2.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs MiniMax M2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs GLM 4.6
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
GPT-5.4 NanoView full model details- GPT-5.4 Nano vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
- GPT-5.4 Nano vs DeepSeek V3.2
- GPT-5.4 Nano vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
- GPT-5.4 Nano vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5 Mini
- GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
- GPT-5.4 Nano vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B
- GPT-5.4 Nano vs MiniMax M2.7
- GPT-5.4 Nano vs MiniMax M2.5
- GPT-5.4 Nano vs MiniMax M2.1
- GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
- GPT-5.4 Nano vs o3
- GPT-5.4 Nano vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- GPT-5.4 Nano vs LongCat 2.0
- GPT-5.4 Nano vs MiniMax M2
Our take
GPT-5.4 Nano is 1.2x cheaper for a typical chat. GPT-5.4 Nano scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (20.7 vs 17.5). GPT-5.4 Nano has the larger context window (400K vs 131K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer 30B or GPT-5.4 Nano cheaper?
GPT-5.4 Nano is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $1.25 per 1M output tokens, while Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $1.20 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, Muse Glimmer 30B or GPT-5.4 Nano?
GPT-5.4 Nano supports up to 400K tokens of context, compared with 131K for Muse Glimmer 30B.
Is Muse Glimmer 30B smarter than GPT-5.4 Nano?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Muse Glimmer 30B scores 17.5 and GPT-5.4 Nano scores 20.7, putting GPT-5.4 Nano ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use Muse Glimmer 30B and GPT-5.4 Nano at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Muse Glimmer 30B and GPT-5.4 Nano answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to Muse Glimmer 30B and GPT-5.4 Nano at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.