AI model comparison
MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Side by side comparison of MiniMax M3.1 Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash on pricing, benchmark scores, context window, and more.
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is a multimodal model from MiniMax. Compared with M3, it delivers significant improvements across multiple benchmarks, particularly in complex agentic tasks, coding, and cybersecurity.
- Input / 1M
- $0.15
- Output / 1M
- $0.60
- Context
- 1M
GLM-5.3-Flash is a native multimodal model from Z.ai. It is suited for efficient coding and long-horizon agent tasks.
- Input / 1M
- $0.01
- Output / 1M
- $0.20
- Context
- 1.05M
Comparing image generators? Compare image models
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
GLM 5.3 Flash
5.5x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
42.7 vs 41.8 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
GLM 5.3 Flash
1.05M vs 1M tokens
Newer release
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Released October 19, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Coding index
Agentic index
Pricing
MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.01 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.60 | $0.20 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.02 | $0.01 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Long document summary
150K in, 2K out
Specs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1.05M tokens |
| Max output | 524K tokens | 944K tokens |
| Input types | Image, Text, Video | Image, Text, Video |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Max, Extra high, High, Medium, Low | Max, High, Low |
| Default reasoning effort | Max | Max |
| Release date | October 19, 2026 | August 26, 2026 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Not supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Not supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Not supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
- MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3
- MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Step 5 Preview
- MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5
- MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Ling 3.1 Flash
- MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna
- MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
- MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4 preview
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy3
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs Step 5 Preview
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.1 Flash
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna Pro
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Nemo
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
- GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX
Our take
GLM 5.3 Flash is 5.5x cheaper for a typical chat. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (42.7 vs 41.8). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.05M vs 1M tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax M3.1 Flash or GLM 5.3 Flash cheaper?
GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.01 per 1M input tokens and $0.20 per 1M output tokens, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 1M for MiniMax M3.1 Flash.
Is MiniMax M3.1 Flash smarter than GLM 5.3 Flash?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores 42.7 and GLM 5.3 Flash scores 41.8, putting MiniMax M3.1 Flash ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use MiniMax M3.1 Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see MiniMax M3.1 Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to MiniMax M3.1 Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.