AI model comparison
MiniMax M2.5 vs MiniMax M2.1
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
MiniMax
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax-M2.5 is a SOTA large language model designed for real-world productivity.
- Input / 1M
- $0.27
- Output / 1M
- $1.08
- Context
- 205K
MiniMax
MiniMax M2.1
MiniMax-M2.1 is a lightweight, state-of-the-art large language model optimized for coding, agentic workflows, and modern application development.
- Input / 1M
- $0.30
- Output / 1M
- $1.20
- Context
- 205K
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
MiniMax M2.5
1.1x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
MiniMax M2.5
22.8 vs 20.9 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
Tie
205K vs 205K tokens
Newer release
MiniMax M2.5
Released February 12, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Coding index
Agentic index
Pricing
MiniMax M2.5 vs MiniMax M2.1 API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.27 | $0.30 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $1.08 | $1.20 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.03 | $0.03 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Long document summary
150K in, 2K out
Specs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 205K tokens | 205K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Input types | Text | Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Not available | Not available |
| Default reasoning effort | Not available | Not available |
| Release date | February 12, 2026 | December 23, 2025 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Not supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Not supported |
| Deterministic seed | Supported | Not supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
Our take
MiniMax M2.5 is 1.1x cheaper for a typical chat. MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (22.8 vs 20.9). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax M2.5 or MiniMax M2.1 cheaper?
MiniMax M2.5 is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). MiniMax M2.5 costs $0.27 per 1M input tokens and $1.08 per 1M output tokens, while MiniMax M2.1 costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $1.20 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, MiniMax M2.5 or MiniMax M2.1?
MiniMax M2.5 supports up to 205K tokens of context, compared with 205K for MiniMax M2.1.
Is MiniMax M2.5 smarter than MiniMax M2.1?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, MiniMax M2.5 scores 22.8 and MiniMax M2.1 scores 20.9, putting MiniMax M2.5 ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use MiniMax M2.5 and MiniMax M2.1 at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see MiniMax M2.5 and MiniMax M2.1 answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to MiniMax M2.5 and MiniMax M2.1 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.