AI model comparison
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Side by side comparison of Kimi K3.1 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flash on pricing, benchmark scores, context window, and more.
Kimi K3.1 Pro is Moonshot AI's flagship open-weight multimodal reasoning model and a post-trained successor to Kimi K3, with a 1M-token context window.
- Input / 1M
- $2
- Output / 1M
- $10
- Context
- 1.05M
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is an open-source foundation model developed by Xiaomi.
- Input / 1M
- $0.14
- Output / 1M
- $0.28
- Context
- 1.05M
Comparing image generators? Compare image models
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
21.4x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Kimi K3.1 Pro
55.1 vs 37.9 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
1.05M vs 1.05M tokens
Newer release
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Released October 23, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Coding index
Agentic index
Pricing
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $2 | $0.14 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $10 | $0.28 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.20 | $0.00 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | Not available | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Long document summary
150K in, 2K out
Specs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.05M tokens | 1.05M tokens |
| Max output | 944K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Input types | Image, Text, Video | Audio, Image, Text, Video |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Max, High, Low, None | Not available |
| Default reasoning effort | Max | Not available |
| Release date | October 23, 2026 | September 21, 2026 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Not supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Not supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.1
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Fable 5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6 Sol
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Grok 4.7
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Kimi K3
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GLM 5.3 Flash
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Hy4 preview
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Hy4 preview
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Hy3
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Astra
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna Pro
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Mistral Nemo
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Ling 3.1 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Our take
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 21.4x cheaper for a typical chat. Kimi K3.1 Pro scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (55.1 vs 37.9). MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.05M vs 1.05M tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K3.1 Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Flash cheaper?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 per 1M input tokens and $0.28 per 1M output tokens, while Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2 per 1M input tokens and $10 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, Kimi K3.1 Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 1.05M for Kimi K3.1 Pro.
Is Kimi K3.1 Pro smarter than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.9, putting Kimi K3.1 Pro ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use Kimi K3.1 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flash at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Kimi K3.1 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flash answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to Kimi K3.1 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flash at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.