AI model comparison

GLM 5.2 vs MiniMax M3

Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.

GLM 5.2 is a large-scale reasoning model from Z.ai.

Input / 1M
$0.62
Output / 1M
$2.42
Context
1.05M

MiniMax-M3 is a multimodal foundation model from MiniMax.

Input / 1M
$0.30
Output / 1M
$1.20
Context
1.05M

Comparing image generators? Compare image models

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

minimax logo

MiniMax M3

2.0x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

z-ai logo

GLM 5.2

33.7 vs 29.2 on Artificial Analysis

Larger context window

Tie

1.05M vs 1.05M tokens

Newer release

z-ai logo

GLM 5.2

Released June 16, 2026

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

z-ai logoGLM 5.233.7
minimax logoMiniMax M329.2

Coding index

z-ai logoGLM 5.268.8
minimax logoMiniMax M358.6

Agentic index

z-ai logoGLM 5.238.4
minimax logoMiniMax M329.5

Pricing

GLM 5.2 vs MiniMax M3 API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metricz-ai logoGLM 5.2minimax logoMiniMax M3
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$0.62$0.30
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$2.42$1.20
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens$0.14$0.06
Cache writePer 1M tokensNot availableNot available

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

z-ai logoGLM 5.2$2.45
minimax logoMiniMax M3$1.20

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

z-ai logoGLM 5.2$28.28$13.88 cached
minimax logoMiniMax M3$13.80$6.60 cached

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

z-ai logoGLM 5.2$97.84$25.84 cached
minimax logoMiniMax M3$47.40$11.40 cached

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metricz-ai logoGLM 5.2minimax logoMiniMax M3
Context window1.05M tokens1.05M tokens
Max output944K tokens512K tokens
Input typesTextImage, Text, Video
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsExtra high, High, NoneNot available
Default reasoning effortHighNot available
Release dateJune 16, 2026May 31, 2026

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metricz-ai logoGLM 5.2minimax logoMiniMax M3
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputsSupportedSupported
JSON modeSupportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedSupported
TemperatureSupportedSupported
Stop sequencesSupportedSupported
Deterministic seedSupportedSupported
Verbosity controlNot supportedNot supported

Our take

MiniMax M3 is 2.0x cheaper for a typical chat. GLM 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (33.7 vs 29.2). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM 5.2 or MiniMax M3 cheaper?

MiniMax M3 is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $1.20 per 1M output tokens, while GLM 5.2 costs $0.62 per 1M input tokens and $2.42 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, GLM 5.2 or MiniMax M3?

GLM 5.2 supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 1.05M for MiniMax M3.

Is GLM 5.2 smarter than MiniMax M3?

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, GLM 5.2 scores 33.7 and MiniMax M3 scores 29.2, putting GLM 5.2 ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.

Can I use GLM 5.2 and MiniMax M3 at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see GLM 5.2 and MiniMax M3 answer side by side and keep the better response.

z-ai logominimax logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to GLM 5.2 and MiniMax M3 at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.