AI model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Inkling
Side by side comparison of Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Inkling on pricing, benchmark scores, context window, and more.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is a high-efficiency model from Google with upgraded agentic capabilities.
- Input / 1M
- $0.30
- Output / 1M
- $2.50
- Context
- 1.05M
Inkling is an open-weight multimodal mixture-of-experts model from Thinking Machines Lab, with 41B active parameters out of 975B total.
- Input / 1M
- $1
- Output / 1M
- $4.05
- Context
- 524K
Comparing image generators? Compare image models
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
2.2x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Inkling
12.5 vs 11.7 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
1.05M vs 524K tokens
Newer release
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Released July 21, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite11.7Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite49.3Agentic index
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite14.3Pricing
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Inkling API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $0.30 | $1 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $2.50 | $4.05 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.03 | $0.17 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | $0.08 | Not available |
| Web searchPer request | $0.014 | Not available |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$1.85Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$19$10.90 cachedLong document summary
150K in, 2K out
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$50$9.50 cachedSpecs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.05M tokens | 524K tokens |
| Max output | 66K tokens | 472K tokens |
| Input types | Audio, File, Image, Text, Video | Audio, Image, Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | High, Medium, Low, Minimal | Max, High, Medium, Low, Minimal, None |
| Default reasoning effort | Minimal | High |
| Release date | July 21, 2026 | July 17, 2026 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Not supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Not supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Supported | Supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Supported |
| Deterministic seed | Supported | Not supported |
| Verbosity control | Not supported | Not supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteView full model details- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiniMax M3
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Inkling Small
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Command A+
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Hy4 preview
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Our take
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 2.2x cheaper for a typical chat. Inkling scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (12.5 vs 11.7). Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the larger context window (1.05M vs 524K tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Inkling cheaper?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $2.50 per 1M output tokens, while Inkling costs $1 per 1M input tokens and $4.05 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Inkling?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 524K for Inkling.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite smarter than Inkling?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores 11.7 and Inkling scores 12.5, putting Inkling ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Inkling at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Inkling answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Inkling at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.