AI model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is Anthropic’s most advanced Sonnet model to date, optimized for real-world agents and coding workflows.

Input / 1M
$3
Output / 1M
$15
Context
1M

Gemini 2.5 Pro is Google’s state-of-the-art AI model designed for advanced reasoning, coding, mathematics, and scientific tasks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is scheduled to be retired on October 20, 2026. Consider Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview instead.

Input / 1M
$1.25
Output / 1M
$10
Context
1.05M

At a glance

Quick verdict

How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.

Lower price

google logo

Gemini 2.5 Pro

1.8x cheaper for a typical chat

Higher intelligence score

anthropic logo

Claude Sonnet 4.5

20.7 vs 16.1 on Artificial Analysis

Larger context window

google logo

Gemini 2.5 Pro

1.05M vs 1M tokens

Newer release

anthropic logo

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Released September 29, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores

Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.

Intelligence index

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 4.520.7
google logoGemini 2.5 Pro16.1

Coding index

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 4.552.1
google logoGemini 2.5 Pro33.3

Agentic index

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 4.515.8
google logoGemini 2.5 Pro1.6

Pricing

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro API pricing

Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.

Metricanthropic logoClaude Sonnet 4.5google logoGemini 2.5 Pro
Input tokensPer 1M tokens$3$1.25
Output tokensPer 1M tokens$15$10
Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens$0.30$0.13
Cache writePer 1M tokens$3.75$0.38
Long-context pricingPer 1M tokens, for very long prompts$6 in / $22.50 out above 200K$2.50 in / $15 out above 200K
Web searchPer request$0.01$0.014

What it costs in practice

Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.

Chat message

2K in, 500 out

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 4.5$13.50
google logoGemini 2.5 Pro$7.50

Coding task

30K in, 4K out

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 4.5$150$69 cached
google logoGemini 2.5 Pro$77.50$43.75 cached

Long document summary

150K in, 2K out

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 4.5$480$75 cached
google logoGemini 2.5 Pro$207.50$38.75 cached

Specs

Context window and capabilities

How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.

Metricanthropic logoClaude Sonnet 4.5google logoGemini 2.5 Pro
Context window1M tokens1.05M tokens
Max output64K tokens66K tokens
Input typesFile, Image, TextAudio, File, Image, Text, Video
Output typesTextText
Reasoning effort levelsNot availableNot available
Default reasoning effortNot availableNot available
Release dateSeptember 29, 2025June 17, 2025

Features

Supported features

API features available for each model.

Metricanthropic logoClaude Sonnet 4.5google logoGemini 2.5 Pro
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputsSupportedSupported
JSON modeSupportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedSupported
TemperatureSupportedSupported
Stop sequencesSupportedSupported
Deterministic seedNot supportedSupported
Verbosity controlNot supportedNot supported

Our take

Gemini 2.5 Pro is 1.8x cheaper for a typical chat. Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (20.7 vs 16.1). Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window (1.05M vs 1M tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro cheaper?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 per 1M input tokens and $10 per 1M output tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3 per 1M input tokens and $15 per 1M output tokens.

Which has a bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Gemini 2.5 Pro supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 1M for Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 smarter than Gemini 2.5 Pro?

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores 20.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 16.1, putting Claude Sonnet 4.5 ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.

Can I use Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro at the same time?

Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro answer side by side and keep the better response.

anthropic logogoogle logo

Why choose? Ask both.

Send one prompt to Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.