AI model comparison
Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol
Pricing, context window, benchmarks, and features compared side by side. Or skip the guesswork and send one prompt to both.
Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 improves on Claude Fable 5 across the board, with the biggest gains in agentic coding, long-running agentic workflows, and knowledge work: long code refactors, front-end and visual
- Input / 1M
- $10
- Output / 1M
- $50
- Context
- 1M
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Sol is the flagship model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series.
- Input / 1M
- $2
- Output / 1M
- $10
- Context
- 1.05M
At a glance
Quick verdict
How the two models stack up on the things people ask about most.
Lower price
GPT-5.6 Sol
5.0x cheaper for a typical chat
Higher intelligence score
Claude Fable 5.1
53.4 vs 47 on Artificial Analysis
Larger context window
GPT-5.6 Sol
1.05M vs 1M tokens
Newer release
Claude Fable 5.1
Released September 1, 2026
Benchmarks
Benchmark scores
Independent scores from Artificial Analysis. Higher is better.
Intelligence index
Claude Fable 5.153.4GPT-5.6 Sol47Coding index
Claude Fable 5.181.6GPT-5.6 Sol77.4Agentic index
Claude Fable 5.157.9GPT-5.6 Sol50.2Pricing
Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol API pricing
Per-token API rates. Cheaper option highlighted.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokensPer 1M tokens | $10 | $2 |
| Output tokensPer 1M tokens | $50 | $10 |
| Cached input (read)Per 1M tokens | $0.25 | $0.20 |
| Cache writePer 1M tokens | $12.50 | $2.50 |
| Long-context pricingPer 1M tokens, for very long prompts | Same rate at any length | $4 in / $15 out above 272K |
| Web searchPer request | $0.01 | $0.01 |
What it costs in practice
Estimated cost per 1,000 requests at standard rates. Coding and long-document figures also show the cost when the input is already cached.
Chat message
2K in, 500 out
Claude Fable 5.1$45GPT-5.6 Sol$9Coding task
30K in, 4K out
Claude Fable 5.1$500$207.50 cachedGPT-5.6 Sol$100$46 cachedLong document summary
150K in, 2K out
Claude Fable 5.1$1600$137.50 cachedGPT-5.6 Sol$320$50 cachedSpecs
Context window and capabilities
How much each model can read, how much it can write, and what it accepts as input.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1.05M tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Input types | File, Image, Text | File, Image, Text |
| Output types | Text | Text |
| Reasoning effort levels | Max, Extra high, High, Medium, Low | Max, Extra high, High, Medium, Low, None |
| Default reasoning effort | High | Medium |
| Release date | September 1, 2026 | July 9, 2026 |
Features
Supported features
API features available for each model.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Tool calling | Supported | Supported |
| Structured outputs | Supported | Supported |
| JSON mode | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Temperature | Not supported | Not supported |
| Stop sequences | Supported | Not supported |
| Deterministic seed | Not supported | Supported |
| Verbosity control | Supported | Supported |
Keep exploring
More on these models
Other head-to-heads, the full model page, and the alternatives list for each model.
Claude Fable 5.1View full model details- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Sol
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.8
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Luna
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Hy4 preview
GPT-5.6 SolView full model details- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 5
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Fable 5
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.3
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.7
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM 5.3
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.6
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K3
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5.6 Terra
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5.4
Our take
GPT-5.6 Sol is 5.0x cheaper for a typical chat. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (53.4 vs 47). GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger context window (1.05M vs 1M tokens). The right pick depends on your workload, so the quickest way to settle it is to send the same prompt to both and compare.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.6 Sol cheaper?
GPT-5.6 Sol is cheaper for a typical chat (2K input tokens and 500 output tokens). GPT-5.6 Sol costs $2 per 1M input tokens and $10 per 1M output tokens, while Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10 per 1M input tokens and $50 per 1M output tokens.
Which has a bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.6 Sol?
GPT-5.6 Sol supports up to 1.05M tokens of context, compared with 1M for Claude Fable 5.1.
Is Claude Fable 5.1 smarter than GPT-5.6 Sol?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Claude Fable 5.1 scores 53.4 and GPT-5.6 Sol scores 47, putting Claude Fable 5.1 ahead. Benchmarks don't capture everything, so the best test is running your own prompts through both.
Can I use Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-5.6 Sol at the same time?
Yes. Shortcut Chat sends one prompt to multiple models at once, so you can see Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-5.6 Sol answer side by side and keep the better response.
Why choose? Ask both.
Send one prompt to Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-5.6 Sol at the same time. Compare the answers side by side and keep the best one.